Draft talk:PHP

I don't mean to be (too much of) a pest, but straight up ripping articles from Wikipedia, lacking most of the templates that make the article function, miles on end of red links, no apparent original contributions to the content and no apparent credit to wikipedia where this was drawn is not a good look for the wiki (not that it is anywhere near the first or last page on this site to do so). This should not have been moved from draft when it contains flagrant script errors and fails to either credit its original location or in any way bring an original contribution to the table. It, like many other pages, are why a number of users even on Miraheze might look and consider this place a knockoff of Wikipedia where the sole stressed difference, a 'not harsh administration', is presented as badly as being a lazy one instead. --Raidarr (talk) 09:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * You're not by any chance wrong! I personally have said that articles shouldn't contain issues (which includes redlinks) because having you mentioned those above, it also affects the wiki's credibility and appearance on search engines. I've said this countless times that articles should be maintained, especially redlinks, they should be fixed. Well, It wouldn't be a bad idea if you join clean up the mess though, I'd personally appreciate. Chimobi (talk) 13:45, 3 September 2021 (UTC)