User talk:Onepel33

Could you please edit my wikipedia so it won't be deleted?

-- New user message (talk) 22:28, 5 January 2021 (IST)

New Page Patroller granted
Hi Onepel33. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at FP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember: The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. --Magogre (talk) 14:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Ugochimobi. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Magda Chelly, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chimobi (talk) 23:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Citation
I have added 6 cite in this page https://en.famepedia.org/wiki/Fardin_Ahmed_Shovon. how many citation you need Sourov hasan (talk) 12:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, To let you know. Citations and refernces are two different things. Your page which has been previously deleted didn't had a reliable sources to be on Famepedia. And a gentle reminder, do not create pages on yourself. Keep editing.Onepel33 (talk) 16:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC).

Using admin tools
Please don't use your admin tools as you aren't authorised by the community as there were enough oppose votes. The the decision to promote you was made by only one user who is not in good standing without considering community input. And your admin flag will likely be removed. We apologise. Thank you! --Magogre (talk) 20:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Please do as was said here @Onepel33 i suggest making no more actions. Cocopuff2018 (talk) 20:20, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm asuming a good faith and being politically neutral. I'm not supporting or working for any of the disputers. Neither I'm getting paid from anyone. I have been granted the rights by the bureaucrat and I'm doing my work which you all should suppose to do. There are hundreds of articles left unreviewed in draft space. Are you guys here to involve in politics or selflessly contribute to the platform? I can see you guys are having a dispute with another but that doesn't mean you'll suppress the newcomer who don't want to involve in this politics. I didn't requested for this right. Rights which i wanted was denied by you guys and now instead of supporting and helping me out, you are not letting me do my work. Again I'm repeating, I'm not supporting any of the disputer/defaulter. Onepel33 (talk) 20:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC).
 * Assuming good faith for what. Are you referring to block us otherwise? The wiki has already got enough drama, so please stop. You don't even know that the draft articles are abandoned in draft space and waiting to get deleted after six months. How are we supposed to help, if we strongly opposed your candidacy. Again, have a look at your damn unsuccessful RfA. You don't even know how to intent your posts, how could we support. Please stop using tools before you run into brick wall along with others. --Magogre (talk) 04:42, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * yes do as whats being said above, and as i will mention me and @Magogre have done more work then you even have completed on this wiki, and i have proof of RFP sucessfull for both of us Now i would suggest not using the admin tools before i let stewards know your misusing the tools you did not even work towards, additionally not listening to what is being said is not how you willl earn community trust which makes your chances even lower of gaining rights in the future
 * i would watch my next move and words carefully. we done need your extra drama @Onepel33 Cocopuff2018 (talk) 07:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Onepel33 requested the right in good faith and out of an apparent desire to contribute. I obviously held opinions about the nomination and the way it was managed, but I think attempting to help run the place regardless of partisan politics and apparently operating in accordance to local policies does him credit here.
 * There is enough confusion that Sunil can appear to be a valid authority and Steward oversight is the only kind that should reasonably override him. So I'd leave this alone and simply note how he performs as admin, as he may ultimately prove himself competent in spite of the underlying issues of the wiki, and when things are resolved we can offer guidance on the things he is less skilled at doing. This is where we are at the moment and both of you, Magorgre and Cocopuff, should know the current situation is only temporary as it is. --Raidarr (talk) 09:37, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Or not, given Ugo has now proven that Sunil does not know how the user rights system works. --Raidarr (talk) 10:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @Raidarr is right. I am assuming a good faith and contributing to FAMEPedia. I don't have any selfish motive to contribute. Neither I own this nor I get payment to contribute. Even I didn't gave my nomination nor I have any issue with it. I was nominated and I accepted. That's it. I don't want to involve in the politics. Ugo and Sunil has a dispute but why are other editors are affecting themselves and taking it personally. They should oppose in a right way. But @Magogre@Cocopuff2018 are simply giving me a warning as it's their personal property. I also mentioned this and warned @Ugochimobi for his behaviour towards me. Why is he messing with me. His dispute is with Sunil, he should limit to him not with other editors. What he did is simply intolerent. And now, I believe he will not repeat this again after my words. Else it will not be good for him and his supporting editors. Also @Cocopuff2018@Magogre @Ugochimobi Well done guys! You are taking this Famepedia as personal. I don't have any issues with the administrative rights but now you guys have taken back my page patrolling rights as well. I requested also but you denied. What should I do now? Just simply scroll the Famepedia and create new articles and wait for your orders? It's pathetic. @Raidarr I believe something fishy is cooking between the two group.Onepel33 (talk) 17:34, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I wasn't aware your rights were removed. I just restored them back. Chimobi (talk) 17:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Onepel33, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.FAMEPedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3AOnepel33 added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see FAMEPedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Sunilbutolia (talk) 08:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed
Hello, Onepel33

Thank you for creating Dilip Patel Sirohi.

User:Sunilbutolia, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sunilbutolia (talk) 09:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Sunilbutolia. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Yogesh Rawal, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

☆★ SUNIL BUTOLIA   ( ✉✉ ) 05:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Pending Review a Page
Hello sir please review this page Tanvir Nahid now I am add some source please check it and remove top tag sir Selim563 (talk) 04:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I have reviewed the page and came to the conclusion that the article still needs additional reliable sources for verification. I'm giving you 5 days to show his notability. Onepel33 (talk) 16:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
Hello sir I am cerate a Page Tanvir Nahid it's not promotion page you can check it on google searching by his Name Tanvir Nahid please check it out and improve and remove the tag on the top. Niloynil89 (talk)

Delection Tag
Please Remove Delection Tag From Sorif B. Mahmud And Update Information.

Please Remove Delection Tag From Sorif B. Mahmud and update information on this encyclopedia article. Subha Shirin (talk) 05:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Subha Shirin, I will not remove the deletion tag because the subject doesn't qualifies for the FAMEPedia   article. Onepel33 (talk) 05:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you @Perneric for the barnstar. It gives me a boost. I'll keep contributing to it.Onepel33 (talk) 09:35, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * most welcome brother۔This is your right Perneric (talk) 14:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * This is a question for you. If not sow. So I can ask you. Perneric (talk) 14:26, 29 June 2022 (UTC)