FAMEPedia:Requests for adminship/Bukkit


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. 

Final (0/1/0); ended 19:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC)  Chimobi (talk) 19:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination
– I am requesting to be an administrator (sysop) to help clear this wiki of vandals, bad actors, and more. If granted the right, I will work for an indefinite period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bukkit (talk • contribs) 03:40, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve FAMEPedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: I plan to help within, warning bad actors and vandals, as well as helping with reverting vandalism edits.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to FAMEPedia, and why?
 * A: My best contributions are most likely helping clearing the backlog of redlinks. It’s helpful, because when articles link to a page that doesn’t exist, that means there are missing pages.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: On FAMEPedia, no, but on Wikipedia, yes. I reverted users edits, but I accidentally reverted another users edit instead of the one below. I apologized, and we just thought that it was a Good Faith mistake.

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.
 * Optional question from Mazzaz
 * 4. Hello Bukkit. Suppose you are already an admin, will you please tell me how will you deal with this unblock request? Will you accept or decline the appeal? If you accept/decline, what will be your rationale behind that?
 * A: I would decline the appeal, because the appeal is rather vague. They have not stated their block reason, and I would like to accept appeals that are more than a sentence long, and explains what they did wrong without admins needing to go to the Block Log the see what they did.
 * 5. A user engages in serious BLP Violation and is reported in AIV but you find that the User is already globally locked. Will you block them and can you state the policy here on whether Admins should block globally locked users or not?
 * A: Hm, this is a tricky question, but I would not block them as they cannot sign-in and thus, they cannot create violations on that account.

Discussion

 * Links for Bukkit:.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1)   the candidate seems to only want to help with vandalism and spam, not other things such as Editing and growing a community, this here makes me think this candidate has no Effort of wanting to edit but to only help with vandals but like I tell user's some times you can help by reverting and reporting issues to the admin, along with there recent incident I Would like the Candidate to give themselves more time to earn the communities trust and make constructive edits without user rights, then we can discuss  lower ranks and work up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cocopuff2018 (talk • contribs) 03:26, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , to make some things clear – editing and growing a community doesn't require the admin rights either and reverting vandalism also counts a making edits. Many times, we need to have admin tools to fight the spam, like deleting spam pages on sight and blocking spambots to prevent further spam. One shouldn't be raising the above issue, as Bukkit has been helpful here, with no red flags in his history. That was a case on meta not here. Edits doesn't matter (you nearly had the same number of edits when you ran a few days ago) but I am now thinking of proposing a change to the policy. And don't forget to sign your posts. Happy editing with the mop! ~ Mazzaz (talk) 04:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * i would agree on a policy change to the requirements @Mazzaz Cocopuff2018 (talk) 04:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

General comments

 * I'd discourage anyone to comment on this RfA about what has happened on meta in past. ~ Mazzaz (talk) 06:42, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Bukkit has made not many edits since he made this request i would recommend him make more edits before admin request plus I feel its kinda still too early Cocopuff2018 (talk) 17:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I am planning on editing later today, I’m doing some thing right now, so I cannot do them at the moment. Bukkit (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, Mazzaz said,
 * (you nearly had the same number of edits when you ran a few days ago)
 * So when I run, you oppose because of my edits are low, but you ran with nearly the amount that I have. I’m sorry, but this doesn’t make sense. Bukkit (talk) 18:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello there, I was wondering why after you request adminship, you were suddenly no where to be found, No edits, log actions from since you requested adminship here.... Can you explain that??

I hope you've read the guidelines stated here, the Advice for RfA candidates, and the one for young editors too. Although this a premature run, but since there's currently no minimum requirement, But that doesn't mean anyone can request for adminiship JUST LIKE THAT. Editors must be matured an advanced before thinking about Adminship.

This definitely going to be the last RfA that we'd accept from an Inexperienced editor. I understand that fact that you've joined the Miraheze network for almost 1yrs (with former username as WikiJS. Chimobi (talk) 10:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


 * , I’m starting to think that it is snowing, and that it’s too early. Bukkit (talk) 18:59, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.