User talk:Sunilbutolia

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Ugochimobi. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sarwan Ali Palijo, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chimobi (talk) 10:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kishan Butolia


A tag has been placed on Kishan Butolia requesting that it be speedily deleted from FAMEPedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with FAMEPedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. --Magogre (talk) 10:34, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Blue Badge.png
Thanks for uploading File:Blue Badge.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. FAMEPedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on FAMEPedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Magogre (talk) 10:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Sunil Butolia with Udit Raj.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sunil Butolia with Udit Raj.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. FAMEPedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on FAMEPedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Magogre (talk) 06:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Clean Politics Movement
Hello, Sunilbutolia,

Thank you for creating Clean Politics Movement.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Kindly translate this page to English as we currently have an English Encyclopedia."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Community noticeboard.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chimobi (talk) 11:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of FAME Media Partners


The page FAME Media Partners has been speedily deleted from FAMEPedia. This was done for the following reason:

"INAPPROPRIATE, What's FAME Media Partners?"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with FAMEPedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Chimobi (talk) 13:31, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:INDINEWS.COM Sees a Surge in User-engagement During Indian Super League 2020-21


Hello, Sunilbutolia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "INDINEWS.COM Sees a Surge in User-engagement During Indian Super League 2020-21".

In accordance with our policy that FAMEPedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to FAMEPedia! Chimobi (talk) 10:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Indian Chat Company Triumphs Regular Instant Messaging


Hello, Sunilbutolia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indian Chat Company Triumphs Regular Instant Messaging".

In accordance with our policy that FAMEPedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to FAMEPedia! Chimobi (talk) 10:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:KineMaster Ranked No. 5 Among Korea's Top Mobile Publishers in Global Downloads


Hello, Sunilbutolia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "KineMaster Ranked No. 5 Among Korea's Top Mobile Publishers in Global Downloads".

In accordance with our policy that FAMEPedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to FAMEPedia! Chimobi (talk) 10:34, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lizan Salar Dizayee


The page Lizan Salar Dizayee has been speedily deleted from FAMEPedia. This was done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with FAMEPedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at FAMEPedia:Deletion Review Chimobi (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Draft:Bonus Borrows are back on hoopla digital Chimobi (talk) 10:47, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Draft:Can surgical masks or respirators prevent Coronavirus? Chimobi (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi
Can you explain this log action and identify what local policies Ugochimobi has violated to warrant being blocked? If there isn't one, I strongly urge you to self-revert your action and admit your faux pas. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 06:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Dmehus, I given him bureaucrat rights to manage wiki on my behalf, but he is trying to become sole owner that is unacceptable. He added himself in "founder" user-group without my permission. Sunilbutolia (talk) 06:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * AFAIK, they were never warned or asked about this. The block is unjustified especially when you have tried no other ways to warn the user. --Magogre (talk) 07:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I discussed him on telegram, but his reply was not satisfactory.
 * My words: I'm not in founder user group why?
 * Ugochimobi: you aren't active enough on the wiki, I handle most of the things, In fact, the community asked for it. Sunilbutolia (talk) 08:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, Sunilbutolia. I might be muddying the issue and if so, this will be the end of my inquiry. I first had a look at Famepedia in July and observed until early September. You're telling Ugo he is not active enough and that you handle most of the things, but in fact you have been completely intermittent for at least this half of the year and have performed nothing for administrative tasks, while Ugo has gone out of his way to actually reform Famepedia to help it not be a functional ripoff of Wikipedia in policies and structure. While I wondered early on what your role was and considered it unwise to act without you in mind, to dismiss his activities entirely is doing a disservice.
 * If you had a problem it should have a) been better communicated and b) if you respect the processes of the wiki, brought up and resolved in public with regards to his on-wiki duties.
 * This is effectively a backstabbing move, and that is unacceptable. Without him to offer some level of guidance, the wiki is either doomed to languish as a partial clone with no unique identity but a very low-key brand, or you have to step up and do more than you've ever done this year and actually participate as a leader. For example this page indicates that the wiki is part of a foundation, but there's been no clue of this.
 * You need to communicate and if you're going to end his involvement, actually step up for the wiki itself. Preferably you actually discuss this in a way that doesn't require the Miraheze global functionaries to get involved. I know Ugo made some missteps and something needed to happen, but this was a rather atrocious method to do it. If you weren't in the group, prove your interest by simply adding it to yourself on reasonable grounds that you deserve it. You're not even in the group right now. --Raidarr (talk) 09:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I have noticed many loopholes in his work (doesn't matter here) and found he was targeting me, was deleting my personal entities, pages of my family members.
 * Also he was replying me on telegram with mis-behaviour.
 * I can't ignore his nonstop hard work, but as a founder I can't accept mis-behave. He was also trying to become supreme power (as he added only himself in the founder user-group).
 * I allowed him to manage wiki on my behalf, I never gave him authority to become supreme power. So please don't write here anymore, he is open to contact Miraheze team. Sunilbutolia (talk) 11:50, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * This is a rather significant decision and issue that cannot be unilaterally cancelled because you don't want to discuss it. But at this point the validity of your actions in staffing really belongs to Steward oversight and arbitration, so I'll focus on the consequences.
 * For one I'm curious how you intend to address this initiative as it was entirely on his back, and I assume it is cancelled or you have some idea to continue it.
 * Secondly, how you intend to offer direction going forward, especially since policies are in place regarding relevance and so forth that the self-promoting of your entities and family were not in line with.
 * These are the immediate consequences of your decisions, not to ask about the long term viability of the wiki. If you wish to discuss it somewhere else, please provide the proper method. Otherwise this is really the only proven place to communicate as nothing in this conversation has been done in line with established policies, just your belief and discretion as sole owner. --Raidarr (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I was one who requested the deletion of your articles and they just fulfilled my requests, but that in no sense warrants a block to a long-term/established (and maybe leading) user. I don't consider telegram a valid place to discuss about the founder flag, it should have been discussed on a discussion page on wiki before you blocked them. I don't know why did they added founder group to their account but they were not trying to become the supreme power AFAIK them, they were doing good work to manage the wiki and help in the de-wikipedia-fication, for the good of the wiki. I still believe that the block is unjustified and you should revert that. --Magogre (talk)  14:28, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree that he has done lot of good work for the community.
 * He is free to join FAMEPedia with different user account, with Admin rights. His old account will remain block to ensure he will not misuse his bureaucrat rights as earlier. He can serve his services as an Advisor, but only one founder is enough. Sunilbutolia (talk) 15:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * im sorry but this is no way to handle this situation at hand we have policies in place for ban evasion, and i dont see the point in another account, IMHO it beats the purpose of the block at hand and would be better, to just unblock the main, Cleary i don't see you as understanding the real points of permissions, and therefore i have made a decision to make a proposal which will handle this situation @Sunilbutolia, another thing none of us have really had much interaction with you however talking with multiple users we see some of your actions as "wrong or incorrectly handled, along with careless of others opinions but instead you keep denying what the community has to say and Automatically make the call yourself, without handling this with a proposal, which gets everyone's opinion on this.
 * although him promoting himself to a higher rank is not in the policies, i don't see this as block worthy but perhaps a community proposal could of been more appropriate to handle this, instead of a block, which you have (abused power) Cocopuff2018 (talk) 18:17, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * In simplified terms, “block his main, but he can have an alt.”
 * Really, you can just remove his bureau user right, and unblock him. Bukkit (talk) 21:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I totally disagree with anyone saying a) he should have an alt, b) his bureaucrat right should be removed or whatever, that's not gonna happen.
 * Sunil only created this wiki and since then he didn't care how the wiki do, Since Joseph joined this wiki and started handling it, that's when you, me, 70% of current registered users joined and now Sunil is talking about trash that is unexplainable. According to a phabricator task, they signed an agreement between them, and Sunil is talking about that he never agreed with Joseph, he never agreed? What made him created a custom email for his co founder? joseph@fampedia.org hugh? What made him shared blog post on the internet saying FAMEPedia's new fouder? Hugh?
 * Joseph is the only founder I know in FAMEPedia, he's damn active and his visions are damn clear, if his bureaucrat right us removed who will manage the Wiki? Although he hasn't said anything about this anywhere, not that I know of, but FAMEPedia is ready to appear wonderfully on the internet and here is Sunil denying him. What the hell is that?
 * I stand with Joseph all my life here, Joseph isn't going anywhere, Sunil will face the repacusion of this later on. FYI, Joseph can actually unblock himself, but he's mature and sensibile that's why he wouldn't, if it was to be some of us we would have unblockes ourselves. AfricaEditor (talk) 06:05, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Why he joined this wiki, who stopped him creating another wiki? Since Miraheze is free to create. I didn't ask him to join.
 * Why he was asking me for Domain login details? Sunilbutolia (talk) 07:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * And for your information, founder becomes on based of shares, but there were no shares declared because I was not agreed with the agreement. How someone can be defined as founder or partner without shares? He was asking me for DNS login details to become supreme in near future. It doesn't matter you all like him because of his hard work. But remember idea is the superior than the hard work, even thousand of volunteers work for wikipedia just for free. Can they claim ownership of wikipedia just on the basis of hard work?
 * I can't allow him as founder or owner because he misused his power. Also he added his known people as administrator. Also misbehaved when I asked him why he added himself as founder. Sunilbutolia (talk) 07:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Mister
 * What about this?
 * https://mobile.twitter.com/sunilbutolia/status/1392335110339403780?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
 * This one?
 * https://web.archive.org/web/20210929124735/https://famepublish.com/business/founder-sunil-butolia-announces-famepedias-new-ceo-ugo-chima-joseph/
 * This one too?
 * https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.prime9ja.com.ng/2021/05/famepedia-announces-ugo-chima-joseph-as.html%3Fm%3D1&ved=2ahUKEwjZs_7e8I_0AhUjmeAKHXWqBQEQFnoECAsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2iJSylx5zTgEesARVbRQ-5
 * Even your twitter account was suspended because of your misappropriation and behaviour? You can't mess around this community and get away with it, this is unlike every other person you've come across and mess with them and get away with it.
 * You didn't agree with his foundership and you posted that on your blog, lol, you even deleted it already, but wayback machine will not shame us, it dug it out.
 * You're joking a big joke FYI.
 * AfricaEditor (talk) 09:16, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Founder and CEO both are different things, don't try to mess them up. I know there are many sockpuppets roaming around FAMEPedia he developed for his support. I have no need of him as a bureaucrat anymore. That's it. Sunilbutolia (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * AfricaEditor gives evidence calling your blatant nonsense for what it is. Ugo joined this wiki because there was something to the idea and because Miraheze by default offers rights to the community over the arbitrary decisions of users who have not set clear policies from the start. Your greatest mistake was using a service that has a community focus rather than a corporate one as you seek to enforce. If someone on Wikipedia tried what you did, that someone would be ousted. You say you are not satisfied with Ugo's answers; I am not satisfied with yours. I think this is going to end rather badly. --Raidarr (talk) Raidarr (talk) 09:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * His attitude was totally different when he joined and approached me to make him admin.
 * Blog post and social media post are posted when he was doing great work with good attitude.
 * Discussion is closed from my side, thanks Sunilbutolia (talk) 09:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Mister, you're gonna face the laws of a united community, I bet you, you can't mess here up with your bad attitude.
 * Joseph is more than a local steward on FAMEPedia here, you can't tell me after the blog post you made, (like I said, thank God for the wayback machine) you deleted the post, see for your information, I have been watching every single one of you right from inception. Joseph is more like a founder of FAMEPedia, even better than you, all you want is promote yourself and go off, come back again, promote yourself and go off, you don't do that here boss man, you at permitted to mess here up.
 * You're saying the discussion is over from your side, sorry Mister, it's a bit pretty for you as you don't know what and whom you're dealing with, FYI, you're dealing with a strong and intelligent Joseph, a very strong community, a noble one for that matter. You're going down trust me.
 * Stop acting you're a boss when you're irresponsible, like I said, I've been watching y'all from inception.
 * I mean, come to think of it, why would you do such a thing, INJUSTICE in the highest order, WRECKLESS attitude, now you want to deny him the fruit of his labour, you want to deny we the community the fruit of our labour? 😂😂 Your attitude is a bit freaking funny to me, now that FAMEPedia is ready to be in good standing? OMG, I pity you. AfricaEditor (talk) 12:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @Sunilbutolia you don't get to accuse us of being his alts, this is just a good example of assuming bad faith, and this is not what we need, i mean look at you you're careless of what any of us think, its like you basically saying "i Don't care what you guys think, i can do whatever" i want, without Joseph the wiki is hereby to be doomed he has done more work then what you ever have, to me it seems your only in it for the power and this is unacceptable  Cocopuff2018 (talk) 14:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Who the hell added you as admin guys?
 * I told him that my laptop is not with me during the covid time, that's why he added you all in my absence to make his motive strong.
 * How you added without my vote cast? As a founder my vote should be compulsory. Even he not asked me to come to vote, he was in touch on Telegram. How he can decide who can join as admin? Sunilbutolia (talk) 16:39, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * im sorry who your asking about how they got admin ? i Gained admin ship With a community vote he nominated us for admin and the community voted us in for admin ship, another thing you never mentioned the "i did not have my laptop during covid" before which to me seems like more excuses being made, (keep in mind if you do try to demote me i can easily use that as another abuse of power)  and accusing us of being his alt is incorrect, what we want is for this wiki to be ran in a fair way..   also seems more like you want to some how get rid of us so you can avoid all this as a work around which is unacceptable  @Sunilbutolia Cocopuff2018 (talk) 16:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Did you said  there's a difference between a CEO and a Founder? Wait do you know the difference between these two roles?
 * Wait, Let me give you a glance:
 * A founder;
 * Strictly speaking, in business the founders are the people who establish the company—that is, they take on the risk and reward of creating something from nothing.Source: Forbes
 * A CEO
 * A chief executive officer (CEO) is the highest-ranking executive of a firm. CEOs act as the company's public face and make major corporate decisions.Source: Investopedia
 * Now one more;
 * A founder CEO
 * A founder CEO is an individual who establishes a company and holds its chief executive officer (CEO) position. If the firm's CEO is not a founder or the founder CEO is succeeded, the firm is said to be led by a non-founder CEO or successor CEO. Source: Wikipedia
 * Do you see all these, these are all the duties Joseph has been performing, I'm afraid you don't even know what you're into at all.
 * and Who are you? now you're talking about As a founder my vote should be compulsory? I can see you're really gone out of place. You aren't a founder but a bad egg, a backstabber, and sort. AfricaEditor (talk) 16:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @AfricaEditor yes, and bad Eggs must go, another thing, he thinks all the power belongs to him but all he has ever done is make this a ripoff wiki while Joseph has made it less of a ripoff, and the fact he wants to question why are we admin, clearly seems more like an excuse to make another move, Another thing i think our next proposal may be to delete the page about him on this wiki.... Cocopuff2018 (talk) 16:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * and to confirm this, on your announcement post Mr Sunil, you said and I quoted that The FAMEPedia Board of Directors today announced the appointment of Ugo Chima Joseph as a founder & chief executive officer
 * You also went further to say "'The FAMEPedia Board is pleased to welcome a leader to direct the wiki during these challenging and exciting times,' said Sunil K. Butolia, chairman of the FAMEPedia Board of Directors."
 * For crying out loud you also said; "In this role, Joseph coordinated how contents are written and how it could get to the Google Search Engine and even Google Knowledge Panel."
 * It only hurt me as Joseph is seeing all these and just be regretting or something.
 * Just like I said earlier on, This community isn't the one you will or can mess with. So sorry you don't know what you're into nor what you're doing. AfricaEditor (talk) 17:09, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhindora (web series) has been accepted
 Dhindora (web series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of FAMEPedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  help desk . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Sunilbutolia (talk) 13:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Notice of discussion
There is currently a discussion at FAMEPedia:Requests for comment/Sunilbutolia regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Magogre (talk) 16:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Demoting me
why you demoted me? i had a successful request for admin? @Sunilbutolia Cocopuff2018 (talk) 18:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Simple, he’s power hungry. Bongo Cat (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * And also maybe he did it because he heard something he didn’t like. Bongo Cat (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * but still you were not present your looking for excuses to demote people so you can be power hungry, your just trying to get rid of the truth being said,  nothing in the policies says you have to be present @Sunilbutolia during a RFP Cocopuff2018 (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Re verification needed because you were promoted in my absence. Sunilbutolia (talk) 18:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * You need a re-verification for that? Consensus was reached about him, and he’s a great sysop. There’s a reason why people are leaving FAMEPedia. This is very childish. Bongo Cat (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The only person that needs verification is Sunilbutolia, an absentee admin who is in well over his head. --Raidarr (talk) 19:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Questions regarding this log action and this log action
Hi Sunilbutolia,

I'm Doug, a Trust and Safety Responder volunteer with Miraheze Limited, and I just took note of your log actions captioned above, as well as the immediately above discussion. Could you kindly tell me how you are collecting private personal information from Miraheze users, presumably with their consent, how you are handling their data, and what, if any, local policies with respect to data handling and protection you've put into place?

Thanks,

Doug (Miraheze) (talk) 19:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Which personal information? I don't do it. Sunilbutolia (talk) 00:22, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Sunilbutolia Thank you for your reply. Your log actions state that you're collecting Miraheze users' government-issued photo ID or other government-issued identification, which contains personally identifying information. How do you handle their government issued identification card scans, how do you retain and store the information, how do you provide users access to the information they've consented for you to collect, and how do you handle requests for destruction of their information? As well, do you have a local privacy policy in place that outlines this, and what sort of proactive disclosure do you do? Doug (Miraheze) (talk) 00:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually I am not collecting any of personal information, photo ID. I just remarked in log because I know them personally. Sunilbutolia (talk) 08:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Sunil never asked for personal information or photo ID 2405:201:5504:7A54:CC34:DAA5:FFA7:2926 (talk) 10:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Doug (Miraheze). I know Sunil personally and he didn't ask photo ID to make me an admin on Famepedia. I was contributing to Famepedia selflessly and he elected me as a admin for the same.That's all.Onepel33 (talk) 11:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Sunil never asked for personal information or photo ID Irfanattarikashmiri (talk) 11:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Question regarding your partnership agreement with Ugochimobi with respect to the FAMEpedia "brand"
Hi Sunil,

I'm Doug, a community-elected Miraheze Steward, Ugochimobi has shared with me a two-party founders' agreement with respect to the FAMEpedia "brand," this wiki, and related FAME wikis as a "business concept." Specifically, he has attested that the plan was to "monetize" the wiki(s) in some way, and that the idea was yours. Can you please confirm if this was the case and, if so, clarify what this "monetization" would involve? Please note that, in nearly all cases, Content Policy, a global policy, specifically precludes such monetization.

Secondarily, can you or Ugochimobi please e-mail Stewards a copy of this founders' agreement bearing both your signatures? Otherwise, it has no force or effect. Similarly, since Miraheze is mentioned as a party to the agreement, its legal representatives (i.e., Board members) would need to have signed the agreement for the relevant sections to have any force and effect as well.

Otherwise, failing that, please cite under which local policies you've recently removed various users' rights.

Thanks,

Dmehus (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * "Ugochimobi" just shared his proposal with me, he shared agreement with his signature which he drafted.
 * I was not interested in his proposal because FAMEPedia is not registered yet so I did not sign the agreement but I gave him access to improve wiki on my behalf because he wanted to improve the wiki, he ping me on Whatsapp and requested me for admin rights, I never requested him to join. He has good knowledge of wiki so I extended the access and promoted him to bureaucrat just for seeing his work, there was no legal agreement with us.
 * ==Monetization==
 * We both know we can't do it on Miraheze hosted wiki. FAMEPedia is free and will be free without showing ads.
 * ==Removal==
 * I was absent for last few months because of unavailability of device, but he added his known people as admin without asking me for my vote. Because he was aware that I don't have my laptop with me (I told him on telegram). Because he wanted favor to hijack this wiki.
 * After that he started asking me for domain name login details (he told it's necessary and urgent) but I did not give. This clears his intention that he wanted to hijack FAMEPedia in future. If I don't block him, surely he will block me, because giving him bureaucrat rights was my biggest fault.
 * This was the point his attitude and behavior totally changed, he started talking rudely.
 * He edited my organization page "FAME Internet" and removed ownership detail of FAMEPedia. (FYI, FAMEPedia is a subsidiary of FAME Internet). He also warned me to not to claim FAMEPedia as subsidiary of FAME Internet, he says rudely: "FAMEPedia is not owned by you in any fuc*ing way".
 * He started promoting himself as founder through the FAMEPedia (without legal agreement or appointment letter).
 * He then added himself in founder user-group without asking me. When I asked him why he added himself in founder user group ? He replied that: "I be active and you don't"...
 * So if someone be active on Wikipedia, he will become owner of Wikipedia? What a joke.
 * In last, giving bureaucrat rights does not mean I made him owner. Who stoped him to create a fresh miraheze wiki? Why he came to FAMEPedia? Because he wanted to hijack ready made site.
 * If you really want to help him then 1) ask him to create a fresh miraheze wiki or 2) ask him to join FAMEPedia with different username. 3) stop claiming himself founder of FAMEPedia. Sunilbutolia (talk) 00:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @Sunilbutolia hello, may i ask if i am being demoted as admin, can you Explain on were in the policies it says you have to be present for a promotion, may i ask have you even looked at my successful request for admin ship?  additionally  were is their proof that he said he was gonna hack this wiki i see no proof of that, but mainly if i am not admin here how am i suppose to have the tools to keep working on the wiki also please explain
 * without their a Policy which says you must be present for a promotion then its still successful, i mean if a user at wikipedia user is no present for a promotion then they just miss out on it and the votes are still counted,.
 * how is it fair to promote other users with no RFP but demote me without one how  is this fair? Cocopuff2018 (talk) 00:42, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Said agreement is not valid because I didn't sign on that.
 * Ugochimobi was given bureaucrat rights for temporary but he has made it for permanent without my consent. It's scam and cheating. Sunilbutolia (talk) 08:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Ugochimobi has already reverted all his contributions made to famepedia wiki's so he should be removed because he wrongly extended bureaucrat rights without informing me. Sunilbutolia (talk) 08:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BDL Studios


The article BDL Studios has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under FAMEPedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Cocopuff2018 (talk) 01:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sunil Butolia/Quote


Hello, and welcome to FAMEPedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sunil Butolia/Quote requesting that it be speedily deleted from FAMEPedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see FAMEPedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with FAMEPedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Magogre (talk) 04:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sakshi Joshi has been accepted
 Sakshi Joshi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of FAMEPedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  help desk . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Sunilbutolia (talk) 12:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sourav Jain has been accepted
 Sourav Jain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of FAMEPedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  help desk . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Sunilbutolia (talk) 06:25, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dalit in Media has been accepted
 Dalit in Media, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of FAMEPedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  help desk . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Sunilbutolia (talk) 02:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Kumar Sonkar has been accepted
 Ajay Kumar Sonkar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of FAMEPedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  help desk . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Sunilbutolia (talk) 03:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Quick improvement
When I'm trying to add reference to any article. The page is wanting confirmation code but not showing anything. २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 21:40, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Admin Accounts With No Edits
Hi Sun,

from looking at the Accounts flagged as an admin i am curious to why Editorofstudy, And  Irfanattarikashmiri   Both have admin flag, From what i am seeing, they have made 0, edits and if however they are your alts i would strongly advise you to ensure they comply with the local Policies, Additionally may i suggest you to list a note which says they are your alts, promoting accounts with 0 edits is something which is  not recommended and Should be decided within the community, before promoting. Cocopuff2018 (talk) 13:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Cocopuff2018 Thank you for your kind information.
 * I have removed rights because they both were not contributing. In future we will use consensus to promote users. Sunilbutolia (talk) 14:01, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * not a problem  and i surely hope you plan to keep me as admin! (:  @Sunilbutolia  Cocopuff2018 (talk) 14:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi @Cocopuff2018,
 * @AfricaEditor,
 * @Magogre you all are eligible to continuously use your adminship in full swing and to make positive contributions to the FAMEPedia community.
 * We don't allow imported pages from Wikipedia.
 * We want at least 3 verifiable references/citations to accept an article.
 * We don't allow copyright content from any other websites.
 * Websites having domain authority less than 40 may be considered as not verifiable source.
 * You can suggest feedback anytime for betterment of FAMEPedia. Sunilbutolia (talk) 20:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Great! and totally agree with the terms you made above! @Sunilbutolia Cocopuff2018 (talk) 21:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

The Walking Dead page
Hi @Sunilbutolia

i wanted to let you know the walking dead page you deleted was not imported from wikipedia but was written by me and of course cited therefore the page is fine and should be restored Cocopuff2018 (talk) 00:55, 2 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Cocopuff2018, do the needful Sunilbutolia (talk) 04:44, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoast SEO has been accepted
 Yoast SEO, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of FAMEPedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  help desk . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! ☆★ SUNIL BUTOLIA   ( ✉✉ ) 15:36, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlucci Keys has been accepted
 Carlucci Keys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of FAMEPedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  help desk . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Onepel33 (talk) 16:33, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

block perms
@Sunilbutolia

why did you remove block perms from admin, admin are suppose to have block perms? if something happens when your not around i cannot block it if i dont have perms to it Cocopuff2018 (talk) 05:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)


 * i fixed it, as i am assuming you did that on accident (: Cocopuff2018 (talk) 05:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, actually I was resetting to default since Ugo changed everything in his own favor. ☆★ SUNIL BUTOLIA   ( ✉✉ ) 05:47, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Temp Crate
Hello, @Sunilbutolia

is it ok if i add me crate for a few days so i can fix some stuff up around the wiki, i will remove it after? Cocopuff2018 (talk) 13:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Sunilbutolia ^^^ Cocopuff2018 (talk) 13:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * OK, I am giving you crate perm for 1 week. ☆★ SUNIL BUTOLIA   ( ✉✉ ) 14:06, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * But in this period you will not change group metadata for user groups as you did on 6th Feb. ☆★ SUNIL BUTOLIA   ( ✉✉ ) 14:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: New user message has been accepted
 New user message, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of FAMEPedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  help desk . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Onepel33 (talk) 03:38, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Indian TEDx speakers has been accepted
 List of Indian TEDx speakers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of FAMEPedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  help desk . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! ☆★ SUNIL BUTOLIA   ( ✉✉ ) 01:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Article deletion
Hello,

I don't want to delete my article. I'm not doing any promotion. If you are thinking that there is a promotion It's by a mistake. Give me some time i'll do correct it.

Thanks Akdas Hayat (talk) 02:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Significant news coverage is mandatory to make article authenticated. Without news, article will be deleted after 7 days. ☆★ SUNIL BUTOLIA   ( ✉✉ ) 03:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angelo Ruggeri has been accepted
 Angelo Ruggeri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of FAMEPedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  help desk . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! ☆★ SUNIL BUTOLIA   ( ✉✉ ) 07:10, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Pending Review
Hello sir please check my article Tanvir Nahid I am add some new source please approve and remove speedy deletion from the top. Selim563 (talk)

Contact me As soon as possible
Sunil bhai tumara website dekho number nahi mil raha hai jaldi ho...... Services lena hai dusra phone pe number tha wo phone chori ho gaya jaldi do bhai